Monday, March 10, 2014

Blue Is The Warmest Color (2013)

Poster courtesy of BLT Communications, LLC.

I saw this movie what seems like ages ago, but I absolutely cannot get away with not writing about it. Blue Is The Warmest Color (La vie d'Adele) is an epic romance adapted from the critically acclaimed graphic novel of the same name by Julia Maroh. The film was created in two chapters and directed and written by Abdellatif Kechiche. The main stars are Lea Seydoux and Adele Exarchopoulos. There is much controversy surrounding this film, which I believe might make for interesting conversation, but first I would like to discuss the plot.

Blue Is The Warmest Color is a romantic coming of age tale that focuses on a young high school girl, Adele, who slowly comes to terms with her sexuality through the help of a confident, older lesbian Emma. As Adele becomes more confident in her sexuality, she begins lacking confidence in her relationship, leading to jealousy and suspicion, eventually to a heart-wrenching climax and conclusion.

With no hesitation, I say that this film is my favorite from 2013. I tend to prefer movies that focus more on character development in comparison to films that seem overly saturated with plot. As such, Blue Is the Warmest Color is certainly a character study, with characters that I so deeply related to that I went to bed crying after viewing the film. I am so intensely passionate about this film that I even have a poster hanging in my room, expectant of the blu-ray to arrive in the mail any day, and own the English language version of the graphic novel. I don't want to give away any spoilers, although I wouldn't say there are many spoilers to give. As I said before, this film is not reliant on plot so much as it is reliant on characters. That being said, nothing truly happens in the movie so much as characters happen.And that is why I was drawn to this film; to me, the important facets of life are people and their lives.

The film premiered at the 2013 Cannes Film Festival in Cannes, France, unanimously clinching the prestigious and sought after Palme D'or award for Best Film. It was during it's premiere at the festival that multiple controversies surrounding the production came to surface. Director Kechiche was accused of harboring a harsh working environment, tampering with overtime pay, and avoidance of labor law requirements, which caused multiple crew members to quit while on set. In September of 2013, only 4 months after the premiere of the film, lead actresses Seydoux and Exarchopoulos went public with what they called a "horrible" experience on set with Kechiche. Kechiche's response to the negativity about production was that the film shouldn't be released at all, saying "I think this film should not go out; it was too sullied." The resistance Kechiche showed to releasing the film affected its distribution as a whole, resulting in the films inability to qualify for the 2014 Academy Awards for Best Foreign Language Film.

The controversies aside, Blue Is The Warmest Color is a masterpiece of a film. A recent re-watch only cemented my opinion that this movie will stand as an example for years to come. The naturalism of the acting, which was achieved by Kechiche through countless retaking of shots, marks an important departure from formalism, which is a new trend in the recent years. Kechiche, regardless of the negative press he has received, inspired me and invoked my passion for film once again. His techniques, such as only allowing the actors to read the script only once, and then demanding improvisation for each scene, creates an environment of real life where the actors are given free creative reign, allowing them to emerse themselves entirely in the experience of the film. And that's what it is all about, isn't it? Naturalism, realism, being true to the character, but evoking past experiences as source material.

I loved Blue Is The Warmest Color. I recommend this film to anyone and everyone. A++.

Sources:
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/blue-is-warmest-color-shouldnt-635532?



Wednesday, March 5, 2014

Gravity (2013)

Poster design by The Refinery

Gravity is a film directed by Alfonso Cuarón, starring Sandra Bullock and George Clooney. Sandra Bullock plays Mission Specialist Ryan Stone and George Clooney plays veteran astronaut Matt Kowalski. The film is about a space mission, in which Stone and Kowalski are sent to the Hubble Space Station in order to service it. While Bullock is working on the station, they are informed by their Mission Control that a Russian mishap involving a missile strike on an obsolete space station caused a cloud of debris that is orbiting around the earth at their altitude. This event changes the entire course of the film, without giving away any spoilers.

I think it is important to note some interesting facts about this movie. It must be first stated that 80% of this film was CGed, which is comparative to James Cameron's 60% in Avatar. Gravity was awarded 7 Academy Awards at the 2014 ceremony, one specifically being awarded to its achievement in visual effects. Due to the heavy reliance on computer generated visuals, Sandra Bullock was often strapped into a rig for 10 hours at a time, a rig that was used to simulate her actions in space. This aspect of generated visuals only further insists that Cuarón was extremely dedicated to the idea of realism when depicting space travel.

There are some inaccuracies to be noted, however, inaccuracies that I would argue do not detract from the film as a whole. Some of these inaccuracies are as follows:
  • Stone is never shown wearing ventilation garments
  • Kowalski would only have had to have been tugged back in by Stone, instead of unclipping himself from Stone
  • Stone's tears wouldn't have floated off of her face, but instead stuck due to surface tension
These are only a handful of the few inaccuracies that were noted about the film, those being noted by Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson and astronomer Phil Plait.

I enjoyed this film immensely. I was initially hesitant due to my (questionably shallow) dislike of Sandra Bullock, but was pleasantly surprised with her performance, and the general master-fulness at which the film was shot. Overall, Cuaron created a masterful, realistic rendering of space travel, all the while grounding the film with worldly issues. As Gravity is a movie about rebirth, both Stone and Kowalski are faced with colossal danger in which they need to survive or overcome in order to overcome the chains and shackles of their past.

 As Stone is the main Character of this tale, her journey of rebirth is perhaps the most dominant storyline within the movie. The trials she is faced with directly correlate with the earthly problems that haunt her past. As she conquers each problem, she is one step closer to closure. As the film is a mere 91 minutes long, the audience is left begging the question whether or not Stone's ordeal in outer space is enough to help her through the reality that awaits her on earth. Without giving away any spoilers, I believe there are certain moments in a person's life that are so traumatic and life altering that the things they might have faced in the past are ultimately altered in their present mindset.

Photo thanks to IndieWire
 The photo above demonstrates a pivotal scene. Bullock here is depicted as a small child within the womb of a mother. What could be more symbolic of rebirth than Stone curled like a baby in a womb?

I give this film an A rating and suggest it to anyone who might be interested in themes of rebirth and identity, or even those who might be curious about outer space.

EDIT: I recently received a comment where a reader showed interest in the reaction to the 3D version. As I haven't seen the 3D version, I did some quick research to find out all I could about the films release in 3D. 

All that I found showed that Gravity was always intended to be shot in 3D and IMAX and that the reception was almost entirely positive, aside from a few outliers. Gravity is currently the third film worldwide in terms of revenue grossed from IMAX 3D showings, third only to The Dark Knight Rises and Avatar. It was released in 330 IMAX 3D theaters in North America alone. Gravity has been lauded as a film made specifically for the IMAX experience, with "the crystal-clear images coupled with IMAX's customized theatre geometry and powerful digital audio creat[ing] a unique environment that make audiences feel as if they are in the move." Basically, Gravity's images and audio effects work in perfect sync with the IMAX technology. With the money grossed in IMAX showings alone, it can be seen that audiences went specifically for what the film was made for, the IMAX 3D experience.

Source: http://www.forbes.com/sites/scottmendelson/2014/02/07/gravity-passes-100m-worldwide-in-imax/

Thursday, August 15, 2013

A little update

I know I am been missing for about half a year. There aren't any excuses I can come up with other than things just go ahold of me and I didn't have much time to upkeep this little blog here. But today I had the realization that I needed to turn a new leaf. It's been hard for me to write regularly, so I decided that this blog need revamping in order to keep me on track.

I used to use this blog for mainly movie reviews, and while that aspect will stay the same, I plan on added some other points of interest as well, such as my personal ventures into the film/production work with jobs and internships, as well as my own personal projects, whether they be productions, writing, or anything creative like that. So stay tuned! There are fun things in store!


Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Detachment (2011)

Promotional still from the movie
Over the holiday weekend, I had the pleasure of seeing "Detachment." The film is directed by Tony Kaye, who is best know for his Oscar nominated film "American History X." This film stars Adrian Brody, Christina Hendricks, Lucy Liu, James Caan, and newcomer Sami Gayle.

The story is that of a long term substitute teacher, Henry Barthes, portrayed by Brody. Henry is a very disconnected person who seems like he has little to no feelings for those around him. He is the lone caretaker of his ailing grandfather, and experiences flashes back into his traumatic past. Somehow he ends up taking in a young girl who was prostituting herself near his apartment building, his aim to help get her back on her feet and off to a youth rehabilitation center. Henry's personal story is the main focus of the film, although it was marketed as a feel good story about a high school substitute that makes a difference in a failing school. His experiences in the high school where he subs is the backdrop for the rest of the issues his character faces. A good portion of his realizations occur while at school, although they focus mainly on his own personal endeavors.

I had been very eager to see this film for a long time and I really enjoyed it. I found that it took an interesting approach to what could otherwise be skewed as a feel good high school film. It presented real life issues in a very bleak light and expected the audience to be able to handle what they saw. Because the directed took this approach, it became apparent that the director was trying to bring a realistic feeling to the film. The realism did not feel forced, but natural. I believed that the issues covered in the film were issues that teenagers and adults face on a regular basis. It also intrigued me how the characters took each issue and personally dealt with it.

One example is one of the girls in Henry's English 10A class. Meredith is a girl who was bullied constantly, an artistic girl who liked taking photos, but was a disappointment to her parents. She wished to go to art school but her parents dashed her dreams, instead continuously berating her for being different. She turned to Henry, who felt burdened by her and unsure if he could help because he felt very similar feelings of emptiness, and so when she felt she had no one else to turn to, she killed herself.

This movie did not play with the emotions of the audience. It gave to viewers exactly what it promised; a bleak vision of a lower middle class high school and the children and adults whose lives center around the school. I give this film an A-.

Midnight Cowboy (1969)

Promotional still from the movie

"Midnight Cowboy" is a film directed by John Schlesigner in 1969. It stars Dustin Hoffman as Ratso and Jon Voight as Joe Buck. I entered the viewing of this film with absolutely no information on it. I was aware that Dustin Hoffman acted in it, but the plot eluded me, so upon my viewing I was pleasantly surprised at what I found.

It is a story of a over eager "cowboy," Joe Buck, who desperately wants to make money. He abandons him job in Texas and moves to New York City to become a male hustler. Joe is naive and unexperienced in the field he wishes to enter, so once he arrives in the Big Apple, he is in for a rude awakening. He is easily taken advantage of by his first customer, and then a slimy Ratso cons him out of $20. He is left penniless and on the streets, resorting to desperate measures to earn any sort of money. Eventually Joe and Ratso reunite and plan to make Joe into an irresistible male companion for all the lonely New York women. The duo never seem to have any success, and them film ends with Ratso's tragic death, leaving the viewer feeling unfulfilled. 

I thoroughly enjoyed this film. I was very excited when it turned out not being about a cowboy on a horse in the middle of the desert. Instead it tackled some very serious topics, such as the modern condition of a society and how difficult it is to become successful in the wake of the late 60's with all the forces of nature pushing you towards failure. Joe Buck is fighting against an infrastructure that has been in place for decades and it is entirely impossible for him to break in to. There is also the fact of repression and how Joe is not only escaping Texas to find a new job, but because of a past that is so traumatic that is sits in his subconscious, subtly eating away at his sanity. 

Stylistically, what made the film unique was it's editing. It used a form of montage in which images and frames were spliced together to create a dramatic and unsettling feeling. This montage style of editing was most effective during moments when Joe was unwillingly coming face to face with his past. Joe, in his shocked and unhinged state, would retreat back into his mind and the images that flashed upon the screen were from the event from his past that changed his life. As the film progresses, Joe has more and more of these visions in which he must face his past. Each time, the audience is given a little bit more information to go on, until finally realizing just what happened to Joe that made him so desperate to become a prostitute. 

I thoroughly enjoyed this film and would suggest it to any one who is interested in a unique look into the time of the late 60's. I give this film a A. 

Monday, November 12, 2012

Cloud Atlas (2012)

Poster byWORKS ADV
"Cloud Atlas" is a science fiction film directed by Lana and Andy Wachowskis and Tom Tykwer. The film takes places over generations and ages and realities and dreams and fantasies. The film stars Tom Hanks, Halle Berry, Ben Whishaw, and Xun Zhou.

"Cloud Atlas" does not follow a linear story line in that it recounts the tale of a main character in straightforward fashion. Instead it cuts back and forth between characters and these characters individual tales. The film has many main characters across various eras and times. The stories of these characters at first seem to be standalone stories, but by the end of the film it becomes apparent that all the stories are somehow connected in one way or another. Something interesting about the film: the actors did not only play one role, but played many roles over all the different narratives.

What I found most intriguing about this film was it's use of storytelling. Each character passed through their story as if they singlehandedly controlled their own destiny. As the narrative progressed, however, it became apparent to the viewer, as well as the character, how very untrue this mentality was. The characters were no more in control of their own life as they could be in control of another humans life. The film was more about the codependency of a race, of a group of people, of a couple than anything else. It became clear that each character and their existence was only made possible by the reliance on others. The message of the film, often repeated by the characters across story lines, was that everyone is connected. Characters who lived in a Neo Soeul in 2114 were dependent on those characters who lived in Victorian England, and so on and so forth.

If I were to have a complaint about this film, however, it would be directly related to one of the story lines followed. Tom Hanks and Halle Berry both star in in one tale titled "The Hawaiian Islands on post apocalyptic earth (dated 2321)." My largest complaint was primarily the dialogue and how it was spoken. The lines given to the actors was written in a severe reconstruction of the English language, a new vernacular of sorts for those on earth who survived the apocalypse. Whenever this story was on screen, I had a hard time paying attention due to the fact that I couldn't understand a word that was being spoken. This drew me out of the film experience, which is one of my greatest pet peeves. If it were to eliminate this story entirely from the film, I would have had a much more pleasant time watching the film.

I enjoyed "Cloud Atlas" overall. I found it entertaining, and at some parts even moving. I will rate it a C+ only because at times I felt the message of the film was being continuously repeated as if I was unable to understand it. I also thought "Cloud Atlas" was trying to desperately to be what "Tree of Life" (directed by Terrence Malick) was two summers ago.

Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Beloved (2011)

Promotional still from the film
Christophe Honoré is by far my favorite director. I first came across his films in high school when I rented his film Dans Paris from Blockbuster. Since that chance encounter with him, I have not been able to get enough. I've seen pretty much his entire filmography, and that includes films produced by him, presented by him, written by him, and of course those directed by him. Until seeing Beloved, however, I had never seen one of his films in theaters. So when I saw that the Criterion Cinema in downtown New Haven was showing it, I knew it was a chance I couldn't pass up.

Honoré has a very distinct style. It is often celebrated by critics, but also condemned. After the release of his 2004 Ma Mère and 2006 Dans Paris, Honoré was praised as the grandchild of the New Wave, which is one of the most influential film movements of the recent age. In recent years, however, he has been criticized as becoming too sentimental. With this last sentiment, I would have to disagree. 

Beloved is Honoré's second musical. It follows the lives of two women over the course of their lives, documenting their loves and their losses and everything in between. The two women are mother and daughter. The mother, played by legendary Catherine Deneuve, has long standing affair with the love of her life, father of her child, and once husband, even though she divorced him and married again. The daughter falls in love with a gay man, all the while ignoring the one man who loves her for who she is. 

The film is documented in segments of decades. This allows the exploration of various facets of the women's lives and how time has or hasn't changed them. There is also a parallel created between mother and daughter. Decisions that have been made by the mother are decisions that the daughter tries desperately to replicate, but the gravity of her situation of being in love with a gay man forever blocked her from any type of true happiness or contentedness that her mother might have found. This can show the affects of an upbringing and the environment that a child grows up in, not to mention the changing of the times. While the mother remains married to her current husband, having an affair on the side, she finds a way to balance her lives and have some semblance of happiness. The mother is from a time of the past, where a sort of restrained nature is applauded over acting out. This is a time that the daughter can't replicate. Even with the openness of relationships and sexuality in the modern age, the daughter cannot hold together the two relationships she has, the one with the gay man and the one with the man who truly loves her.

As a whole, the film was very well put together. It was very distinctly Honoré, which is what I love to see. There is a lack of explanation in his films, but rather a focus on shots to do the explaining lost in the dialogue. A lot of what you feel when watching Beloved comes from from exactly that, watching. There is much more to pick up from the photography than from the writing. The only thing I would have to put in the negatives for this film was it's soundtrack. The fact that the film was a musical greatly took away from its impact. Aside from one or two of the songs, most of the music felt forced and out of place. It felt like I was watching a musical rather than a film, which Honoré has avoided in the past. Over all I give this film a B-.